Hi Kip,
Kip Macy wrote:
And another point: when changing external interfaces it might be
possible to ask for a full port build with the changes to look for the
fall-out on ports. I would say that this commit was a good candidate
to
get the port maintainers into the boat earlier.
not so happy,
The only reasonable way to do a full ports build is to ask portmgr to
use the build systems. Although it may now be possible with svn, in
the past there was no way for him to do that for out of tree code.
Hence portmgr does not share your point of view.
Well, they did this in the past, for example when I did some heavy work
on make(1). At that time Kris did this, I don't know through which
magic, though.
What we should have done is grepped for RTM_RESOLVE and the flags that
I removed. However, that did not occur to me. He asked on numerous
occasions for review and someone should have brought it up then. We do
not feel that it is reasonable to hold him solely responsible when he
did not act in a unilateral fashion.
I usually take care of stuff that touches anything that has to do with
the SNMP stuff, but this time the triggering did not work. I probably
was sure that people will directly mail before touching someting in
src/contrib.
Thank you for taking care of that bit of breakage.
No problem. That was a good kick to finally look how this vendor import
stuff works and get the next import prepared.
Don't take it too serious, 't was just a bad day (it started with a
broken cup :-)
harti
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
