Le 20-juil.-08 à 21:49, Julian Elischer a écrit :
Luigi Iannone wrote:
Hi,
A word about the implementation. The interception mechanism for
LISP tunneled packets in ip_input/forward is *horrible*! Some of
that is due to the design, but I believe it can be implemented
much cleaner if you were to use the pfil(9) API. I'd really like
to avoid putting this kind of stuff into the main ip code as it
hurts readability a lot.
Thanks for the hint I'll get a look at that.
my head hurts after reading that :-)
I think I only 'got' half of it..
I'll read it again later..
The aim of this is to reduce routing table size and allow multihoming
You got it.
with the destination being able to suggest to a remote sight how to
route back to it right?
or at least suggest where to go through ...
L.
Cheers
Luigi
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Luigi Iannone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
