On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:16:17 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
>Paul wrote:
>> Get these with GRE tunnel on
>> FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #5: Sun May 11 19:00:57 EDT
>> 2008 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER amd64
>> But do not get them with 7.0-RELEASE
>>
>> Any ideas what changed? :) Wish there was some sort of changelog..
>> # of messages per second seems consistent with packets per second on
>> GRE interface..
>> No impact in routing, but definitely impact in cpu usage for all
>> processes monitoring the route messages.
>
>RTM_MISS is actually fairly common when you don't have a default route.
>
Hi,
I am seeing this issue as well on a pair of recently deployed
boxes, one running MPD and one acting as an area router in front of
it. The MPD box has a default route and only has 400 routes or so.
A steady stream of those messages, upwards of 500 per second.
got message of size 96 on Fri Jun 27 22:25:42 2008
RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address: len 96, pid: 0, seq 0, errno
0, flags:<DONE>
locks: inits:
sockaddrs: <DST>
default
got message of size 96 on Fri Jun 27 22:25:42 2008
RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address: len 96, pid: 0, seq 0, errno
0, flags:<DONE>
locks: inits:
sockaddrs: <DST>
default
Is there a way to try and track down what is generating those messages
? Its eating up a fair bit of cpu with quagga (the zebra process
specifically)
---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
