Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am I the only one who would be happier if openssh were not in the base > system at all? I always have to install the port anyway; having it in > the base just gives me more files I need to delete after an install.
Well, it's not going to get any better if you don't talk to me about it. I don't read minds. As for the OP: Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this has been a cause of great pain for a loooong time. > > http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ > > as openssh seems not to be fixing it (and i do not consider a 2mb fixed > buffer to be fixed, especially not from a 100mb link here in tokyo and > servers in the states, europe, and africa), perhaps i could convince > freebsd net folk to do so? OpenSSH is not within the purview of the "freebsd net folk". If you have an issue with OpenSSH, you need to talk to me. The last time I was asked to apply the HPN patches to base, IIRC, they had not yet been submitted to (and rejected by) the upstream vendor, so I decided to wait and see. The NoneCipher issue comes up regularly, and is on my todo list for the 5.0p1 upgrade (along with several other things, such as changing the default key type back to RSA). I hope to import 5.0p1 as soon as we have a vendor import policy in place for Subversion. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
