The following reply was made to PR kern/123053; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kern/123053 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:29:01 -0500 On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 05:54:13PM -0500, Eric F Crist wrote: >> Andrey, >> >> I've applied the patch to a 7.0-RELEASE-p1 source tree and rebooted >> my >> system. The card comes UP ok, but shows the following when connected >> to a 100BaseT/ Full Duplex switch port: >> > > By chance, are you referring to kern/123053? That's what the subject of the email says... > >> re0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM> >> ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP <half-duplex>) >> status: active >> >> Once I've assigned an IP to the interface, however, it comes up >> correctly and seems to function just fine. Is there any load testing > > I think, that's normal. > >> I should perform for you folks? >> > > Try one of network benchmarks in ports/benchmarks if you want. > >> re0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM> >> ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80 >> inet 10.0.0.38 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) >> status: active I've run some benchmarks, and they seemed to go pretty badly. After running a few, I realized that I still had two network interfaces up, (em0, and the testing re0), I did an ifconfig em0 down, and was unable to connect in or out from the remaining re0. Perhaps this code isn't all the way complete. Eric ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
