On Feb 2, 2008 8:46 PM, Aaditya Rai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using release 6.2. I need to do allocations upto > 8K which are physically contiguous. > > Is m_getjcl the right call for this? > > Also, if I use m_getjcl to do 4K allocations, after > two or three allocations I start getting cluster/mbuf > allocation failures; or weird memory corruptions. If I > change it to use MGETCL etc. and do 2K allocations, > the same code works fine. > > Is m_getjcl() stable in 6.2? Should I fall back on > implementing my own little backend contig-allocator?
On 6.2 you'll have to fall back your own allocator if you are unable to chain 4k jumbo frames. In -CURRENT physically contiguous jumbo frames are the default. I'm not sure if that made it in to 7.0. -Kip _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
