Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:12:06 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
After many years of good services we will stop using FreeBSD 4.x :)
During my performance regression tests under FreeBSD 6.2 i've found
that polling has lower performance than interrupt.
To solve that issue i've rewritten the core of polling to be more SMP
ready.
Hi,
This is really interesting work! Reading the pdf file, it
seems forwarding performance on 6 and 7 is still much lower than
RELENG_4 ? is that correct ?
Haven't tested RELENG_4 performance in a controlled environment and
thus can't answer the question directly. However using fastforward
on 6 and 7 is key to good performance. Without it you're stuck at
some 150-200kpps, perhaps 300kpps. With it you get to 500-800kpps.
--
Andre
---Mike
You can find a summary of all my tests and the source code at the
following address:
http://www.netasq.com/opensource/pollng-rev1-freebsd.tgz
Feel free to ask more detailed information if necessary and report
any bugs / comments.
Fabien
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--------------------------------------------------------
Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net
Providing Internet Access since 1994
[EMAIL PROTECTED], (http://www.tancsa.com)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
