Christian S.J. Peron wrote:
I am not sure who has their hands in the routing code these days so I figured I would just forward this message off here. Does the following look reasonable?
I'm looking, but mostly with long range goggles on.
Yes, this looks like the right change. rtalloc1() always returns an rtentry with the mutex for that rtentry held.
regards BMS _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
