Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Apr-28 07:08:18 -0500, Jack Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I plan on using NAT so both internal networks can get to the internets.

In the FreeBSD documentation I see there are 3 firewalls, IPFIREWALL,
IPFILTER and PF (BF?).   I just need to do basic filtering and just a few
port forwards.  Nothing to fancy.  Which one would be recommended?

Basically any of them will do what you want.  The major differences are:
- IPFW (IPFIREWALL) is FreeBSD only.  Note that the NAT is in userland.

though that is just fine for your average DSL link.. it is in kernel in 7.0

- IPfilter is the most portable.
- PF runs on *BSD.  Note that (AFAIK) all proxies (eg FTP) are in userland.

Userland NAT or proxies incur significantly higher overheads than
in-kernel equivalents (because the packets have to cross the
kernel/userland barrier twice).  This may be an issue if you have a
very fast Internet connection and an underpowered firewall.


_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to