On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:00:08PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: M> = I'd appreciate if people who are observing the problem will report M> = whether adding DEVICE_POLLING option to kernel config helps them M> = or not. This will help to tell whether the problem is in the above M> = quote or in the import of new versions from vendor. M> M> I tried this yesterday -- before writing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I saw the "system" component M> of the total load being rather high and then enabled polling. M> M> Again, I did not wait long enough to check, whether the system will cease M> communicating completely before enabling polling on em, but the "system" load M> was shooting way up upon starting my backup procedure even when I switched to M> DEVICE_POLLING-using kernel.
We aren't currently speaking about performance, we need to know whether kernel with DEVICE_POLLING option makes NIC work stable. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
