Marko Lerota wrote:
route_lan2="-net 192.168.2.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 -iface xl0"
route_lan2="-net 192.168.2.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1"
Neither of these subnet routes should be necessary as 192.168.2.0/24 is
already directly connected via fxp0.
Do you still see the problem without this route installed?
The netstat output you posted contains the directly-connected subnet
route 192.168.2.0/24 which is automatically added when you configure the
interface address.
Regards,
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
