Pat Lashley wrote:
I think that I'd reverse the default on that. There should normally be no harm in having an LLA address, as long as we've got the non-LLA preference stuff working correctly. It is quite likely that the LLA address would never actually be used; but so what?
I've been thinking about that too, but I'm still not sure. The RFC says that you shouldn't add a LLA address to an interface that already is configured with a routeable address. Configuring LLA via rc.conf should probably be done like DHCP, by using a magic word in the ifconfig_ifX-line. We could have two words, one called LLA that would run in the "forced" mode and another LLA2 (I can't come up a good name) which would run in the RFC compliant way. Fredrik Lindberg _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
