Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 18:05 -0700 schrieb Julian Elischer: > Thomas Vogt wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Thanks. I know about the netgraph ether/fec interfaces. But I thought > > about a solution without netgraph. AFAIK Netgraph implies overhead > > and ng_ehter is more complicated to set up. This is a problem with > > non technical people. I'm happy they already know a bit about > > ifconfig commands. > > > two items. > 1/ ng_fec only uses the config framework of netgraph. For data it goes > direct to the interfaces.
Ah good to know. Since this is for a network course it would be easier if this "trunk" could be setup via ifconfig command. But I will try it. > 2/ netgraph is not that high an overhead. (what made you think it was?) Well I heard that netgraph has some overhead on various conferences. I'm planning to use such a feature on very very high loaded GigE router, every extra kernel hook could cost some performance, IMHO. Thanks and cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
