Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today I had to add a new route in the company gateway. So I ran the > command: > > # route add 128.110.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.0.17 > add net 128.110.0.0: gateway 255.255.0.0
You used the wrong syntax. Correct syntax is: # route add -net <destination> <gateway> [<netmask>] So what your command actually did was to add 255.255.0.0 as a gateway for 128.110.0.0 (with an illegal netmask of 10.0.0.17). You certainly didn't want that, but the route command did exactly what you told it to do. ;-) > Running netstat -nr I get the following: > > 0&0xa000011 255.255.0.0 UGSc 15 332 fxp0 => > > this is incorrect, the interface should be fxp1 not fxp0 (that is the > default interface). That's expected. 255.255.0.0 is probably on your default route, so it'll be routed to fxp0. > And Why the destination network is 0&0xa000011 and > not 128.110.0.0 You specified 10.0.0.17 as the netmask, which is 0xa000011 in hexadecimal. When you perform a bitwise-and operation between your destination (128.110.0.0) and your netmask (10.0.0.17), you get zero. That's why netstat(1) displays "0". It also displays the netmask, usually CIDR notation if possible (i.e. "/x"), but that's not possible with your weird netmask, so it just displays "&" followed by the mask in hex. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "Documentation is like sex; when it's good, it's very, very good, and when it's bad, it's better than nothing." -- Dick Brandon _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
