On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 01:27:56PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 03:14:35PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > J> I'm guessing that this is a bug (or feature!). > > This is not a bug, nor a feature. This is a feature, that hasn't > been implemented to the end. > > Historically, the routes in kernel were static. And they are static > now. Historically, BSD won't permit you to install same IP addresses, > or even addresses in the same subnet, on different interfaces. Now, > FreeBSD permits addresses in the same subnet. But route entries are > still static, and aren't reconfigring when an interface changes its > flags.
I expected it was something like that, but I thought I'd still make a little noise about it in case someone was right on the verge of having it fixed :). Joe p.s. have you seen kern/93305? It looks like my em0 still has a few problems. Would you mind taking a look? -- Josef Karthauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.josef-k.net/ FreeBSD (cvs meister, admin and hacker) http://www.uk.FreeBSD.org/ Physics Particle Theory (student) http://www.pact.cpes.sussex.ac.uk/ ================ An eclectic mix of fact and theory. =================
pgphurtlWTUjN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
