On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:50:47AM +0300, Alexey Popov wrote: > Hi. > > VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > >>- L2TP + IPSEC transport mode (= Windows road warrier) > >Did someone tried such a setup ? > >is there a L2TPD daemon running on FreeBSD which could be used for > >that ? > I'm successfully using security/racoon and net/sl2tps with Windows > XP/2003 L2TP clients. I've tried pre-shared key as well as X.509 > certificates auth.
Interesting, I'll try to play with that ! > >Note also that, for now, this won't work easily, as it will require > >dynamic SP entries (roadwarriors....), but I think racoon currently > >can't deal with dynamic policies when ports specified (I'll check > >that). > racoon has passive_mode option. When it is enabled, racoon can create > SPD entries for road warriors. Not exactly: generating policies works when racoon is responder (so passive_mode is just a safety check). And I was just talking about potential complex bundles (don't remember exactly what windows sends for phase2, but I think first proposals are AH+ESP, which will cause problem for generating policies with actual racoon's versions) and about policies with ports only (but perhaps I only had some problems with complex bundles when I had a quick look at such negociations). > If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice > of VPN concentrator. Ipsec-tools port is set to natt "kernel autodetect", and I already have a working patch for FreeBSD6 (http://ipsec-tools.sf.net/freebsd6-natt.diff), which will need some more work (cleaner way of detecting kernel NAT-T support, sync with recent NetBSD devels, port to FAST-IPSEC, etc...), which are all on my (very busy) TODO list. Yvan. -- NETASQ - Secure Internet Connectivity http://www.netasq.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
