> I'm testing rfc2385 support with some of our equipment with current > as of a few days ago, and the support seems, well, rather broken.
I think there is a bug in syncache_respond(). In tcp_syncache.c rev 1.77, tcp_signature_compute() is called before filling the TCP SACK Permitted option and the TCP EOL option. I guess it should be called after filling both the SACK Permitted and EOL option. If this is the cause of the problem, I think it was broken when SACK was imported. However, when we suggested the change of rev 1.73, I should notice the bug. I am sorry I did not know how to test the signature option well. I will try to make a patch tomorrow. Regards, Noritoshi Demizu _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
