Good morning,
after comprehensive tests I am glad to inform that your suggestions works just
fine, so - thanks for help solving our problem.
Truth, i've got one question realated to the exampel rule below:
>ipfw add 1000 fwd ip4 ip from any to any out recv em0 xmit vlan{mumble}
After several tests i have recognized that localy generated packets (like icmp
traffic) never matches this rule. The problem is in "xmit vlan{number}" part.
Is it so because of different place of packet input? Transit packets come to
firewall from ether_demux and passes the rule, while localy generated packets
come to firewall from ip_input and fails on this rule? Using "pass" instead of
"fwd" results in the same.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Donatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: routing problem (with corrected scheme)
> did my sugestion work?
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
