Hi, >>>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:33:32 +0200 >>>>> Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think this behavior is probably not intended and should be treated > as a bug. I did a quick patch in sys/net/route.c > (it's just as easy in sbin/route.c). andre> Unless this causes or supposed to cause some kind of automagic andre> IPv4 in IPv6 encapsulation? Can you check out if this is not andre> the case (RFC references, KAME folks)? I believe it is not intended. IIRC, USAGI has automatic tunnel. So, such route is valid on Linux, and it means IPv4 over IPv6 tunnel. KAME doesn't have such feature. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED],jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
