It appears the TCP urgent pointer is off by 1.
In RFC-1122, section 4.2.2.4 on Page 83 describes the
urgent pointer error in RFC-793.
The 6.0-CURRENT code has the urgent pointer set
to (LAST+1).
Any comments before I sent a PR ?
-- Qing
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
