On 31-Oct-2004 Sean Chittenden wrote: >>> This has long bugged me and tonight I finally snapped and had to do >>> something about it. Example output: >>> >>> 64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=935 ttl=126 time=33.824 ms >>> 64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=936 ttl=126 time=29.138 ms >>> 64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=937 ttl=126 time=28.262 ms >>> 64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=938 ttl=126 time=29.67 ms >>> 64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=939 ttl=126 time=30.963 ms >>> 64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=940 ttl=126 time=30.283 ms >>> 64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=941 ttl=126 time=29.455 ms >>> >>> The source of irritation being line seq 930. The time should be >>> 29.670 >>> since we are accurately measuring the precision to the thousands >>> place. >> >> I think you mean line seq 938. > > Yeah... my eyes are getting blurry... the 8 and 0 look similar at the > moment... probably a good sign I should stop and crash for the night.
You really just meant 9.4e2, right? :-) John _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
