On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 03:38:08PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > I'd suggest to choose PPPoE, not PPTP, because the latter is quite > complicated and violated by some client implementation. You will > not find any problems with PPPoE, since ng_pppoe is compatible with > all known PPPoE implementations.
This is what I am currently looking at. I am considering PPTP only because client is already available in Windows machines for free. While in XP PPPoE is already in, I don't see free PPPoE clients for Win9x. I am a bit worried about behaviour in lossy WiFi environments; I'll give it a try in free time, I guess. > 1) userland ppp, ~200 sessions, ~2Mbit/s. Under peak traffic load > is significant. > 2) mpd, 10 - 50 clients (a small net). The load is almost zero. > Can handle wirespeed 100Mbit, with interrupt load equal to > load on pure Ethernet routing. Thanks. -- Paweł Małachowski _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
