Marco Molteni wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to
provide a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality:
I disagree. I think the time spent here would be better spent on
working on an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code
base would be a good starting point.
Is the SCTP in KAME complete and stable? Are there any other (open
source) implementations of it?
SCTP in KAME is complete, stable and fully supported.
It is mainly developed by the SCTP RFC author, Randall Stewart.
A T/TCP alternative as you are describing sounds very
similar to PR-SCTP (Partial Reliability SCTP). (Don't let the
name fool you, please read the internet draft).
RFC3758 (its a proposed standard now.. not a draft.) :->
R
There is at least another kernel-level open source implementation,
for Linux, plus other user-level implementations.
marco
--
Randall Stewart
803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222(cell)
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
