Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to provide > > a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality: > > I disagree. I think the time spent here would be better spent on working > on an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code base would > be a good starting point.
Is the SCTP in KAME complete and stable? Are there any other (open source) implementations of it? It's my time and I'll do the T/TCP replacement in any case because I think it is useful. :) -- Andre _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
