George S wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been having some trouble with this strange ipfw configuration and I am > pretty sure it is probably a bug. I posted a note to freebsd-ipfw a little > while ago, but I think the problem is better demonstrated with a figure.
Are you sure that you perormed the test you described and the results (count updated etc) actually occured? I would expect rule 9 to catch the packet on its way back and rule 11 never to be triggered. Maybe rule 9 should be a checkstate rule. Ian -- Ian Freislich _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
