John Polstra wrote:
I dropped scottl and re from the cc list, since they're busy and asked us to work it out on our own.
On 20-Aug-2004 Julian Elischer wrote:
Ok so what is the next number that should be used? it's currently #define __FreeBSD_version 600000
600001?
Yes, that would be the next number. I question whether __FreeBSD_version needs to be bumped at all, though, since the change is already reflected in NG_VERSION and NG_ABI_VERSION. Any port that uses netgraph would be compiled against the header files on the system, so I can't see how it would be useful to change __FreeBSD_version for this. (Not that I feel very strongly about it.)
I sort of agree..
We protect ourselves.. we needn't bump the FreeBSD version I don't think..
If you have a good reason for it I'll do it but I don't think it is required.. No port will be compiled
with different options because of this..
I mean 5.3 and 6.0 will already have a netgraph recompile required..
here's a cut-n-paste version.. for comment..
it's ready to commit.
Thanks for taking this on. I haven't tested it, but it looks good. Just one nit: "align" is misspelled as "allign" in the UPDATING entry.
John
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
