Max Laier wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 15:40, Xin LI wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:13:38PM +0100, David Malone wrote: > > > It seems to me that RANDOM_IP_ID might be better as a sysctl rather > > > than a kernel option. Would anyone mind if I changed this? > > I personally think that RANDOM_IP_ID is something that should be tweakable on > a per-interface basis (at least). I usually want randomized IDs on my uplink > interface while it could harm my GigE internal network due to faster ID reuse > cycles.
ip_id is only an issue when you have packet fragmentation going on. Which I doubt for your internal GigE network. > FYI, pf(4) can set randomized IDs on a per interface (and even on a per > connection) basis. > > David, I'd appreciate to review your patches in order to avoid breakage of pf, > thanks. How could random ip_id break pf? -- Andre _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
