On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > The main question is: how to prevent this situation? Of course, as a > workaround I can set net.inet.ip.portrange.randomized to zero, but what's > the real solution? Is it FTP-client or FTP-server that should take care of > the previous DATA port usage? Or even network stack behaviour should be > further modified to avoid this collision? > > Sincerely, Dmitry > -- > Atlantis ISP, System Administrator > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE
Sounds like something that should be dealt with on the server's end. Some of the changes we've made in 5.x might fix the problem, but I don't think anyone has looked into that specific case. A simpler solution might be to use passive mode. I think that you can set that somewhere in the install options. Mike "Silby" Silbersack _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"