On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:43:46AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
+> On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:24:39AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+> > Hi.
+> > 
+> > Do we still need ia_netboradcast field? It is calculated depending on
+> > old-fashion classes (A, B, C). Is it used still?
+> > I wonder if ia_broadaddr isn't sufficient today.
+> 
+> not just that, it seems that ia_netboradcast contains bogus info.

So?

+> This said, how do you plan to handle the alias search, by
+> implementing a per-interface hash table containing the
+> addresses and broadcast addresses ?

First I want to find all places that need fast processing and it probably
needs hash tables for IPs and broadcasts, but I'm not sure if that's all.

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.FreeBSD.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                           http://garage.freebsd.pl
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

Attachment: pgpFOOinnYUAo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to