Re: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking stack)

[Petri Helenius]

Mike Silbersack wrote:

SACK itself really doesn't do much, it's all the new congestion control
schemes (FACK, Rate Halving, etc) that come shipped with most SACK
implementations that do the work and contain most of the complexity.
 

And all this would be non-issue within normal operational context if 
routers would contain adequate buffering and not run crappy software 
which drops packets by default even without congestion.

Pete

_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"