On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:36:50PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 11:02 AM +0200 2004/03/02, Andrew Degtiariov wrote: > > > What's difference (*currently*) beetwen FreeBSD+Zebra and Cisco routers? > > Support for VRRP? Support for various other routing protocols > not covered by zebra/quagga -- at least not yet, if ever? Support > for line cards and other devices that do not exist in a format you > can plug into a PC? > > Maybe there's nothing you can do about this last item, but > there's plenty that can be done on the software side -- just take a > look at all the protocols that have been identified as being > desirable, but not yet implemented by zebra/quagga. > > > Oh, and then there are all the operational issues where > zebra/quagga can't keep sessions going when a neighbor flaps, etc.... > Those would require re-architecting the whole routing system, at ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Congratulation. That's namely what the conversation was about.
> which point it might make a lot more sense to go with a different > implementation -- such as bgpd from OpenBSD. -- Andrew Degtiariov DA-RIPE _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
