On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:28:25AM +0000, Bruce M Simpson wrote: B> However, not including an OSPF/BGP daemon doesn't preclude us from ensuring B> that APIs which are exposed for advanced routing functionality (multipath, B> etc) do the right thing across the board, are well defined, etc.
Yes, this would be a good alternative. If FreeBSD routing API extends, and routing daemon's developers are notified about these extensions, then they will add support for these features. B> As to the second part of your mail: That sounds like a reasonable suggestion, B> I am sure Andre and others are paying attention to this and will take it on B> board when an implementation is nearer. If this is OK from you, I start working on it (second variant using sockaddr_aspath). I'm willing to see this feature, and I have a good testing conditions for it. Please, can you also comment Vladimir Grebenschikov's mail (he posted to -net only). -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
