Yep... But it not so obvious for man like me, who thought just a week ago that netgraph is something beetween net & graphics... like MRTG LOL
Another question: Is is possible that ng_netflow take packets _after_ they are diverted by natd? I apologise, that this would require divert implemented as netgraph node? So... I have no idea how this would work with ipfw ruleset... Any ideas? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gleb Smirnoff > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 2:58 AM > To: Julian Elischer > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bjoern A. Zeeb; Vasenin Alexander aka > BlackSir; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ng_netflow: testers are welcome > Is it possible to make port dependant on kernel module > shipped with base system? How? > For example sysutils/ips is not dependant on ipfw. It is obvious > that ipfw is required for it, as well as in case of netgraph > and ng_netflow. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
