Andre Oppermann wrote:

Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

What is missing in ipfw(8) and its ``fwd'' option from being a
successful implementation of policy routing?


In the technical sense it is.  For larger systems you want automatic
configuration from a routing daemon.  ipfw also has its limits when
it comes to a large number of prefixes which are changing all the
time.

A policy or multi-protocol routing daemon can *effect* the desired policy via ipfw. My original notion was to do this via divert sockets, but for appliance devices this requires horsepower which is not available, and involves too much kernel-userland packet copying.


_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to