On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 08:32:32PM -0800, Bill Fumerola wrote: > [ this isn't really -net material ] > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:50:57PM -0800, Kevin Stevens wrote: > > > >First, Barney was correct: using "ping -f" will run into the ICMP > > >response limitation. Try using "ping -i 0.01 _hostname_", instead, > > >and you may find out that you don't have a problem with packet loss at > > >all at this lower speed. > > > > I wish I had a FreeBSD box to check this on, but from an OS X G5 to an > > Athlon WinXP box (both at 100% CPU from distribfolding client: > > which is completely irrelevant because your winxp machine doesn't have > the aforementioned icmp response limiter.
Can a brothah get a ping "as fast as we can get responses back" (like Juniper's ping rapid) around here? -- Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
