Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Our default of net.inet6.ip6.v6only was off in 4.X, and was changed to
> on on 5.X to follow NetBSD's practice.  This behavior on 5.X breaks
> RFC2553/3493, and the change was intentional from security
> consideration.  But, NetBSD changed it off by default.
> How do you think our default of on?

As long as it is documented well, and the workaround (setting the
IPV6_V6ONLY sockopt "off") is referenced, I don't think it really
matters. Application programmers realize they have *some* work to do
when porting applications to V6. A single sockopt call is not
unreasonable. I think "on" for the security reasons outlined is the
right call - it will at least make people think about those issues, and
most would not without something bringing it up. (That said, it would be
nice if NetBSD would pick a direction and keep it.)

jeff
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to