> But from the KAME maintenance point of view I request only one thing
> regarding this.
>
> Please keep the m_tag design same as OpenBSD (i.e. I'd like to
> avoid changes such as change of member name in m_tag
> structure, behavior-change etc, to prevent inessential merging
> effort among *BSDs)
>
> If this condition is accepted, then we have no problem in adopting
> m_tag in FreeBSD-KAME.
> (as far as I looked though, there is no necessity of such change in
> m_tag architecture, but if you have some difficulties, please let me
> know.)
>

It will be compatible at the source level.  That was the intention from the
start.

    Sam


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to