On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:37:57PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:29:37AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:22:14PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > ... > > > > > Speaking of competition, someone should go look at this: > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2002/07/03/0011.html > > > > > > > > UDP sockets have the same problem... i posted patches for that > > > > case around dec.2000 which i never ended up committing. > > > > > > I spent a half-hour trying to dig for that thread. Do you recall what > > > the subject of it was? When I saw this come up on DaemonNews, the > > > > it was "[patch] fast sbappend*, please try..." > > see > > > > >http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=366972+0+archive/2001/freebsd-net/20010211.freebsd-net > > > > jlemon had an amended patch for that. > > I think we should revisit this keeping in mind the tcp case as well. > > I still have the amended patch in my tree, I'll dig it out this week.
Luigi also mentionned at the end of the discussion that it would be worthwhile to - besides for just keeping a pointer to the last mbuf in the sockbuf - keep a pointer to the last mbuf in the packet. Maybe this pointer could be stashed in the m_pkthdr struct. > -- > Jonathan Regards, -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
