In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While I agree that -STABLE is a more sensitive fish (which is partly > why I really don't enjoy dealing with it -- this argument always comes > up), I think that these types of changes absolutely need to go into > -CURRENT. We shouldn't have to worry about "breaking binary > compatibility" in our development releases. I can almost guarantee > that a lot of stuff isn't going to work without a rebuild when people > decide to go from 4.x to 5.0 anyway. Placing dummy-fillers is just > annoying.
OK, I can live with that for -current. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
