Correct. The master and backup settings and/will override the RFC. Can anyone suggest a few ways that this could all be improved at the kernel level?
-Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Crist J. Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:36 PM
> To: Scott Ullrich
> Cc: 'Barney Wolff'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HUT Project
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:00:30PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > The HUT Project includes FreeVRRPD. Since Sebastien hasn't
> rung in here, I
> > will try to clear the air.
> >
> > Sebastien and I are currently rewriting FreeVRRPD to take
> care of the
> > remaining RFC issues and to cleanup the ARP code. The new
> version will be
> > completely RFC compliant and will feature a few extra bells
> and whistles of
> > its own.
> >
> > My development version currently does not update arp cache
> tables but takes
> > over the Mac. In addition, the master and backup arp
> address are settable
> > for each VRID.
>
> IIRC, the exact MAC address of the virtual router as a function of
> VRID is specified in the RFC?
> --
> Crist J. Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
