On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:44:06 -0800
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> hit the keyboard and punched:
> No, there is an (older) KAME included in FreeBSD; however that one
> doesn't yet represent SAs in the routing table as interfaces.
I still do not understand wether I need KAME or not? What would it gain to
install KAME?
> Sorry for being unclear: You miss a route entry (on the FreeBSD box,
> e.g.) that tells it to forward 10/24 to the OpenBSD box. You can't have
> such a route, because the SA that connects the two isn't represented in
> the routing table (it's a packet filter).
One thing that pops up in my head is, "what if I had an interface in the
10.0.0.0/24 net?". Therefore, I am right now recompiling my kernel to
include 2 loopback interfaces. Then I will set a 10.0.0.x address to it
and we'll se what happens =)
What do you think?
--
Rickard
.--. .--.
.----------------------------------------. | | | | .-.
| Rickard Borgmäster | | | | |/ /
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .-^ | .--. | <
| http://doktorn.sub.nu/ | ( o | ( () ) | |\ \
`----------------------------------------' `-----' `--' `--' `--'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
