>As I said earlier, packets which route through ipfw/natd get unencrypted and
>make it to the remote subnet just fine.
>
>Looking at   'ipfw -a l'   it seems that the ESP packets are being received
>_after_ being diverted to natd, but just
>not sent to the socket:

I'm no IPsec expert (still something I need to look into) but something 
that springs to mind is to allow the packet before the natd divert. I 
couldn't say why this would work (since natd shouldn't touch the packet, 
and you say other packets go through fine), but it's just a hunch =)

         DocWilco


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to