yes, but there is no need to change the packet.. fwd will do exactly what he wants as soon as I can get the network topology worked out :-)
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Crist J . Clark wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:04:25AM -0800, Henry Su wrote: > > Yes, it works: > > > > [00:52:58][root@test2:~]$ telnet 127.0.0.1 8800 > > Trying 127.0.0.1... > > Connected to localhost. > > Escape character is '^]'. > > 12334 > > > > HTTP/1.1 302 Moved > > Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:53:18 PST > > Location: https://216.69.69.254/cgi-bin/login > > 0 > > > > > > Connection closed by foreign host. > > > > > > I found the problem is that the ipfw forwarding does not change the dst ip > > address, so that my redirection socket server can not read these > > fwd packet (since the dst ip is not correct). The solution can be change > > the ip_fw.c to modify dst ip address for the forwarding packet, but I do > > not know how to do it. It has next_hop for fwd. I do not know how to do > > packet manupunation in ip_fw.c's chk func. > > That's what I figured your problem was, but I never got around to > asking for you to check it. > > 'fwd' rules _deliberately_ do not actually modify any data in the > packet. You are looking for something more like NAT. natd(8) may be > overkill for your needs. There are other, more lightweight TCP > forwarders in the ports collection. > -- > "It's always funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's hilarious." > > Crist J. Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
