Hi Julian Yes, we currently have Squid serving this purpose - but as I stated in my first email, ALL incoming Client IP's and Addresses are always that of the GATEWAY_BOX - so for website security and logs, this isn't the best option.. I have yet to try Apache, but I have heard it acts in the same way - can someone clarify this?
Thanks Tom At 14:30 11/12/2001 -0800, you wrote: >Actually I misunderstood your original requirement that the >load be split by domain. > >all you want to do is run apache or squid as a proxy >on the forst machine with the proxy fetching the work >from the two back-end machines. > > >On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Tom Peck wrote: > > > Hi John > > > > How would this work? The two web servers aren't accessible straight from > > the Internet - traffic goes via the gateway box. > > > > Or do you mean why have two web servers? Why not put both domains on the > > one server and then port forward? That would be nice, but the two > > different servers are running completely different environments.. > > > > Cheers > > > > Tom > > > > > > At 08:07 11/12/2001 -0800, you wrote: > > >Why just not use Apache virtual hosts? > > >Or is it the cacheing you wish to do smarter? > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
