> OK, I have a proposal that should fit both opinions.  I'll keep the
> net.link.ether.inet.static_arp to mean what it means now (keep ARP
> table static, no updates except from local process through a routing
> socket writes), and will add another sysctl that will switch the
> meaning of IFF_NOARP from "no arp" to "static arp on this interface".
> How about this?

This would be the best souliution at least for us :-)

Eugene Grosbein

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to