> OK, I have a proposal that should fit both opinions. I'll keep the > net.link.ether.inet.static_arp to mean what it means now (keep ARP > table static, no updates except from local process through a routing > socket writes), and will add another sysctl that will switch the > meaning of IFF_NOARP from "no arp" to "static arp on this interface". > How about this?
This would be the best souliution at least for us :-) Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message