If memory serves me right, JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=
?= wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:16:23 -0700,
> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce A. Mah) said:
> > (kgdb) print rt
> > $1 = (struct rtentry *) 0x3
> > (kgdb) print ln
> > $2 = (struct llinfo_nd6 *) 0x620000
>
> Then rt and ln are surely broken. I have not got the reason yet,
> though...
Yes, rt in particular caught my eye.
> Thanks, then could you try the following command?
intruder:bmah% sudo netstat -rna -M /var/crash/vmcore.1 -N
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NIMITZ/kernel.debug
Password:
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.1.1 UGSc 2 0 dc0
65.192.41.10 192.168.1.1 UGHW 1 61245 dc0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 2 21435 lo0
192.168.1 link#1 UC 3 0 dc0 =>
192.168.1.1 0:0:c0:cb:bd:f2 UHLW 5 17908 dc0 =>
192.168.1.3 0:0:f8:10:7a:a2 UHLW 0 119004 lo0
216.136.204.18 192.168.1.1 UGHW 1 57092 dc0
Internet6:
Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire
::/96 ::1 UGRSc lo0
=>
default fe80::200:c0ff:fecb:bdf2%dc0 UGc dc0
::1 ::1 UH lo0
::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 ::1 UGRSc lo0
fe80::/10 ::1 UGRSc lo0
fe80::%dc0/64 link#1 UC dc0
fe80::200:f8ff:fe10:7aa2%dc0 0:0:f8:10:7a:a2 UHL lo0
fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 Uc lo0
fe80::1%lo0 link#3 UHL lo0
fec0::1:200:c0ff:fecb:bdf2 0:0:c0:cb:bd:f2 UHL dc0
fec0::1:200:f8ff:fe10:7aa2 0:0:f8:10:7a:a2 UHL lo0
ff01::/32 ::1 U lo0
ff02::/16 link#1 UCS dc0
ff02::%dc0/32 link#1 UC dc0
ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0
> Also, please tell us the result of
>
> % ndp -an
intruder:bmah% ndp -an
Neighbor Linklayer Address Netif Expire St Flgs Prbs
fe80::200:c0ff:fecb:bdf2%dc0 0:0:c0:cb:bd:f2 dc0 13h12m41s S R
fe80::200:f8ff:fe10:7aa2%dc0 0:0:f8:10:7a:a2 dc0 permanent R
fe80::1%lo0 (incomplete) lo0 permanent R
fec0::1:200:c0ff:fecb:bdf2 0:0:c0:cb:bd:f2 dc0 23h57m59s S R
fec0::1:200:f8ff:fe10:7aa2 0:0:f8:10:7a:a2 dc0 permanent R
I should mention that the machine whose addresses are
fe80::200:c0ff:fecb:bdf2%dc0 and fec0::1:200:c0ff:fecb:bdf2 is another
FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE box (but running code from before the recent KAME
merge). It is advertising the link-local prefix to this subnet.
As before, please let me know what else I can do.
Thanks!
Bruce.
PGP signature
