At 11:54 PM -0500 7/2/01, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>  > If you really think switching to a better ethernet card will help, I
>  > have a 3C905B sitting here that I can try.
>
>It may.

Ok, I'll try that tomorrow then. Perhaps the varying cruft levels in 
ed(4) vs xl(4), or ISA vs PCI architecture, will help. :)

>  > Nope, ppp -nat, no natd.
>
>Same difference, ppp is implemented as a userland process, nearly the
>same amount of work must be done for either natd or ppp.

Well, I certainly can't get around needing NAT. Would it really add 
that much overhead in processing? I only have three active machines 
on the private network, though I do have 10 port forwarding rules as 
well.

ppp is a busy little process on this machine, but it's not eating 
that much CPU percentage wise (maybe 5-10% during peak bandwidth 
usage).

root      115  0.0  0.9  2524  544  ??  Ss   24Jun01 228:03.06 
/usr/sbin/ppp -quiet -background -nat hse

I do download a bit. :)

03000 55837770 52756978271 allow tcp from any to any established

Bryan
-- 
Bryan Fullerton               http://bryanfullerton.com/
Core Competence               uunet.ca!gts!cspace!bjf
Samurai Consulting
Can you feel the Ohmu call?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to