JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B escribió:
> 
> I have a tiny comment about the following change to the route(8)
> command:
> http://www.jp.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/route/route.c.diff?r1=1.49&r2=1.50
> 
> In the commit log, the committer said
> 
>   Fixed the -iface breakage introduced with the latest KAME merge
>   in revision 1.48.  It is pretty valid and often feasible to use
>   a non-point-to-point interface as the gateway.

In which cases makes sense to use a non-ptp interface as the gateway?
What is the behaviour in that case ?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to