In some email I received from Gunther Schadow, sie wrote: [...] > As an added benefit, the two network interfaces tun0 and fxp0 allow > me to cope with the limited power of IPFILTER's NAT rules (as compared > to IPFW). What is so limiting about NAT in IPFilter ? AFAIK, apart from packet matching capability, IPFilter NAT kicks ass over ipfw or am I wrong ? Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing toget... Lars Eggert
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing toget... Rémi Guyomarch
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing toget... Gunther Schadow
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing toget... Luigi Rizzo
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing ... Gunther Schadow
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing toget... Gunther Schadow
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing toget... Rémi Guyomarch
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing ... Julian Elischer
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing toget... Darren Reed
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing ... Gunther Schadow
- Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing toget... Terry Lambert