On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> I wrote:
> >
> > Unless someone has a good motivation for not doing this, I am going
> > to commit the attached patch that disallows indirect routes with
> > indirect gateways.
> >
> Okay, I will rephrase this. Can you give me at least one example when
> adding an indirect route with indirect gateway will work? If not, I
> strongly insist on excluding this code.
I agree that this is an administration error. However, you could
add a static route like given in the example, and for some
unkown reason, *expect* a routing daemon to learn a direct route
to this network or indirect gateway (not a good idea).
That's the only reason I can think of off the top of my head...I'm
sure there's other reasons.
Nick Rogness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Sanitation Engineer, or might as well be.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
